Jump to content

PubMed RSS Feed - -Validity and reliability of the Rosacea Area and Severity Index (RASI): A scoring system for clinical assessment of rosacea severity


rss

Recommended Posts

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Nov 4. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18721. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a common chronic inflammatory facial skin disorder. Standardized evaluation of the severity and extent of rosacea is important for baseline assessment and treatment effect. The currently used Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) is unspecific and fails to consider subtypes/phenotypes of rosacea and area involvement. The Rosacea Area and Severity Index (RASI) was developed to give a more nuanced evaluation of rosacea features in four facial skin areas adjusted to the relative importance of each area of the face to obtain an overall severity score.

OBJECTIVES: To validate RASI against the IGA and to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for RASI.

METHODS: Sixteen dermatologists evaluated photos of 60 adult patients with rosacea (3 photos pr patient, one from the front and one from each side). IGA and RASI scores were performed for interobserver reliability assessment. To determine intraobserver reliability, 14 dermatologists evaluated 10 other patients twice with at least one week interval.

RESULTS: The IGA and RASI correlated well (Spearman Correlation Coefficient (SCC) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72 - 0.78). Interobserver reliability was moderate for RASI and poor to moderate for IGA. Reliability was strongest for rhinophyma, followed by papules/pustules and erythema, and rather weak for telangiectasia. For area scores, interobserver reliability was strongest for cheeks, followed by nose, chin and forehead. We found a moderate-to-strong intraobserver agreement both for IGA and RASI.

CONCLUSIONS: We have designed a new practical tool to examine clinical severity of rosacea. RASI proved simple and reliable in scoring clinical severity of rosacea with an agreement comparable to the currently used IGA although RASI will provide a more nuanced view of the current rosacea extent and severity. We suggest that RASI is used in the daily clinical setting as well as in clinical studies assessing the efficacy of rosacea therapies.

PMID:36331365 | DOI:10.1111/jdv.18721

{url} = URL to article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use