Jump to content
  • Sign Up
Sign in to follow this  

Peer Reviewed Papers Are Not the Gold Standard?

Recommended Posts


Actually is isn't as off topic about rosacea as it should be, because there are many published peer reviewed papers on rosacea, but I thought it important enough to have this article mentioned in a post to be able to refer to it later, since it points out some of the negative aspects of those who rely on peer reviewed papers. The article, Why we shouldn’t take peer review as the ‘gold standard’, by Paul D. Thacker and Jon Tennant, August 1, 2019, The Washington Post, has this subtitle, 'It’s too easy for bad actors to exploit the process and mislead the public.'

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...