Root Admin Guide Posted July 1, 2007 Root Admin Report Share Posted July 1, 2007 I just ran across something that was new to me, that rosacea is a condition, not a disease (like acne is a condition and acne vulgaris is the disease). The source of this new thought to me was in an article entitled, The Proposed Inflammatory Pathophysiology of Rosacea, by Medscape from WebMD. However I have seen in many articles that rosacea is a disease, such as this recent quote in an article just released, "Rosacea is a common and chronic disorder characterized by flushing, erythema, papules, pustules, and telangiectasia on the central part of the face. Because the facial skin of individuals with rosacea is particularly sensitive, irritants can trigger a worsening of the signs and symptoms of the disease," written by Laquieze, et al, . If rosacea is considered a condition rather than a disease, what would the correct term be for the disease? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAC Member Robert T. Brodell, MD Posted July 2, 2007 MAC Member Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 I just ran across something that was new to me, that rosacea is a condition, not a disease (like acne is a condition and acne vulgaris is the disease). The source of this new thought to me was in an article entitled, The Proposed Inflammatory Pathophysiology of Rosacea, by Medscape from WebMD. However I have seen in many articles that rosacea is a disease, such as this recent quote in an article just released, "Rosacea is a common and chronic disorder characterized by flushing, erythema, papules, pustules, and telangiectasia on the central part of the face. Because the facial skin of individuals with rosacea is particularly sensitive, irritants can trigger a worsening of the signs and symptoms of the disease," written by Laquieze, et al, . If rosacea is considered a condition rather than a disease, what would the correct term be for the disease? The word "disease" sounds ominous to most laypeople......so, I suppose that I favor the word "condition" to describe rosacea. Having said that, I have no quarrel with anyone who wants to call rosacea an "infectious disease" or an "inflammatory disease" or a hormonally mediated "disease." Most words of this type in medicine rooted in latin from thousands of years ago do not have precise definitions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guests Guest Posted July 2, 2007 Guests Report Share Posted July 2, 2007 From: Sandra Cremers, M.D. Subject: RE: Rosacea Research & Development Institute Questions Date: July 1, 2007 2:55:17 PM HST To: Brady Barrows Hi Brady, Good questions. I'll leave #2 to the derm experts. The terms disease & condition are often used interchangeably in the literature. By definition, disease is: A pathological condition of a part, organ, or system of an organism resulting from various causes, such as infection, genetic defect, or environmental stress, and characterized by an identifiable group of signs or symptoms. Rosacea does classify as a disease for this reason. Purists would say that a true disease applies to any condition that impairs the normal functioning of an organism or body. Technically most types of early rosacea do not do this as a rule. Advance ocular rosacea though does. Hope this helps. SLC From: Marianne Boes, Ph.D. Subject: Re: Rosacea Research & Development Institute Questions Date: July 1, 2007 3:43:38 PM HST To: Brady Barrows Question 1: this is semantics: disease, affliction or condition all refer to the same meaning. Question 2: sorry, as I am a PhD, not MD, I can not answer why phycisians choose one or another treatment. Best, Marianne Boes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now