Jump to content
  • Why Form Another Non Profit for Rosacea Sufferers?

    What do you expect from a non profit organization for rosacea? Should the administrators and founders of the non profit organization use most of the donations to pay private contractors that are owned by the director of the non profit organization who also sits on the board of directors? Or should the non profit for rosacea spend most of its donations on conventions for dermatologists?

      by Brady Barrows, Founder, RRDi

      The chief reason I formed the RRDi was when I began investigating how the National Rosacea Society (NRS) spends its donated funds (60%) on private contractors spending about 10% for rosacea research. However, the sad reality is that most rosacea sufferers could care less how the NRS spends its donations. If they did they would do something about this. If you do care, why not read the facts below: 

      On average over many years, the NRS spends approximately 10% to 11% on rosacea research while receiving in donations millions of dollars. To put that in terms you can easily understand, for every dollar the NRS receives in donations 10 cents is spent on rosacea research. The rest goes mostly, over 60%, to private contractors that are owned by the president/director of the NRS, Sam Huff. 

      The NRS is a 501 c 3 non profit organization. Many are unaware that all non profits who make $50,000 or more in a year are required to file Form 990 with the Internal Revenue Service of the USA which is then public knowledge for anyone to read. In the past Form 990 has not required disclosure of who donated the funds (in 2015 there was a notable change about disclosure of donated funds) however, the non profit organization is required to show the percentage of funds from the public or whether the funds are private donations. Several years ago I began reading the Form 990 that the NRS reports and was shocked at how the funds were spent. I encourage you to read all these Form 990 reports that the NRS files with the IRS. [4]

      For instance, in 1998 the NRS received in donations $1,148,375 (over a million dollars!). Of this, only 2.15% of this amount was from the public while 97.85% of this amount came from pharmaceutical companies. Of this total amount the NRS spent only $16,118 (1.5%) on rosacea research. [1] That means that for every dollar donated in 1998 only 1.5 cents was spent that year on rosacea research. To put this in a visual graph see below:
      1998NRSdonationsexpenses.png
      The total expenses that year were $830,856 of which $516,156 (62%) was spent on one private contractor, Sam Huff and Associates. Sam Huff is the director of the NRS. At the time, I thought $1.1 million dollars could be better spent. Why wasn't $1 million spent on rosacea research and the rest on running the organization? I thought rosacea sufferers could do a lot better with donated funds than how the NRS has been spending donated funds. This was the first Form 990 that I read and it knocked my socks off. Are you not shocked as well? Read the NRS Form 990 for 1998 yourself if you have doubts. 

      nrs_990_1998.pdf

      I then discovered a lot about non profits by educating myself on how they work. For example, I learned that many non profit organizations spend very little on their 'mission' and give huge amounts of donated funds to the directors, salaried employees, or to private contractors. For more information on this, read Comparing Non Profit Organizations with Research.

      It is not easy to form a non profit organization. The IRS has made it quite difficult to obtain the 501 c 3 recognition. Basically non profits can organize just about any way they want but getting the IRS to recognize and approve a non profit is another matter that would take too many paragraphs to explain. However, I was able to form the RRDi and get the IRS to approve our non profit and have the recognition letter to prove it. However running a non profit with total volunteers is another matter that is something to write about later. Back to the NRS. I kept following how the NRS spends its donated funds as a non profit.

      The pattern of the NRS since 1998 has been basically the same. 1998 was the only year that the NRS spent only 1.5% on rosacea research. The years since that banner year of 1998 when the NRS received over $1.1 Million US Dollars the NRS has decided to up the money on rosacea research from 1.5% to about 10% on average. Whatever the amount donated the total spending on rosacea research remains about 10 per cent on average after that banner year of 1998. It should be noted that during this same period around 60% of the donations is spent to private contractors owned by Sam Huff, director of the NRS. From 2001 on, the name of the private contractor was changed to Glendale Communications Group, Inc., owned by Sam Huff, and Park Mailing and Fulfillment, Inc., also owned by Sam Huff (view screenshots of the Illinois corporate lookup search results). Most of those years the NRS spent about 10% of its total donations each year on rosacea research. That means that for every dollar donated to the NRS about ten cents is spent on rosacea research. On average for many years around 60% of the donated funds are spent on private contractors owned by the director of the NRS. [2]

      My posts and comments about the NRS for the years 2016 through 2018 are listed in the end notes. [3]

      All NRS Form 990 public filings are listed in end note [4].

      Another rosacea non profit organization that spends most of its donations on conventions for dermatologists (small percentage on rosacea research) is the AARS. The ARSC non profit doesn't disclose what it spends is donations on so we have no idea what it does. 

      Brady Barrows, RRDi Treasurer

      End Notes

      [1] nrs_990_1998.pdf

      [2] NRS Form 990 Spreadsheet 1998 thru the most recent published

      [3] Review of NRS Form 990 for previous years

      How the NRS spent donations in 2013 can be read by clicking here.

      How the NRS spent donations in 2014 can be read by clicking here.

      How the NRS spent donations in 2015 can be read by clicking here.

      How the NRS spent donations in 2016 can be read by clicking here.

      [4] NRS Form 990 from 1998 thru 2018

      nrs_990_1998.pdf

      nrs_990_1999.pdf

      nrs_990_2000.pdf

      nrs_990_2001.pdf

      nrs_990_2002.pdf

      nrs_990_2003.pdf

      nrs_990_2004.pdf

      nrs_990_2005.pdf

      nrs_990_2006.pdf

      nrs_990_2007.pdf

      nrs_990_2008.pdf

      nrs_990_2009.pdf

      nrs_990_2010.pdf

      nrs_990_2011.pdf

      nrs_990_2012.pdf

      nrs_990_2013.pdf

      nrs_990_2014.pdf

      nrs_990_2015.pdf

      nrs_990_2016.pdf

      nrs_990_2017.pdf

      nrs_990_2018.pdf

    • Member Statistics

      • Total Members
        1,359
      • Most Online
        499

      Newest Member
      Tapatalk Test
      Joined
    • Posts

      • *image - Robert Plutchik's Wheel of Emotions. A recent study came to the conclusion that "The emotions of Anger and Disgust have been poorly explored in empirical studies, despite they could be theoretically considered a vulnerability factor for the development of skin disorders and the dermatological extreme consequences, as negative emotionality toward self and the pathological skin condition." [1] Most clinical studies have focused on sadness, fear and anxiety which are the negative emotions related to skin disorders. However this paper concludes that "For most of the theories, anger is the typical reaction to both physical and psychological frustration and constriction."  As for disgust, the paper mentions, "Over the years, not many authors have given their contribution to the empirical study of the emotion of disgust, but several studies show that disgust has the function to keep us away from situations or substances which could be dangerous, or from anything that is abhorrent and dirty, including values, thoughts, people, and, in some cases, even the self." [1] Do you feel that emotions such as anger, disgust, depression, anxiety, apprehension, sadness, or other negative emotions should be investigated more with research?  Could rosaceans come together in a non profit organization and sponsor such research?  If you want to learn more read this post.  End notes  *image courtesy to wikimedia commons [1] Int J Psychol Res (Medellin). 2020 Jan-Jul; 13(1): 71–86. doi: 10.21500/20112084.4078 Negative Emotions in Skin Disorders: A Systematic Review Carmela Mento, Amelia Rizzo, Maria Rosaria Anna Muscatello, Rocco Antonio Zoccali, and Antonio Bruno
      • Isotrexin is a topical gel containing 0.05% isotretinoin and 2% erythromycin indicated for the treatment of moderate acne vulgaris and is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (Ireland) which is owned by Stiefel Laboratories (Ireland) Ltd. - see product insert 2209530.PA1077_123_001.14879f44-cc4d-45fe-9d4e-a5a95f9374b8.000001Isotrexin PIL.180822.pdf
      • In England, an article published in the British Journal of General Practioners, concludes that "Skin problems are the most common reason for a new presentation in primary care, and most patients with skin problems are managed exclusively in primary care" by general practitioners (GPs). Furthermore, "skin problems were usually presented alongside other complaints and resulted in a medication recommendation." This means that more patients in the UK apparently are being treated by GPs rather than dermatologists and the authors of the paper are concerned that "Shared decision making was uncommon and self-management advice not consistently given, with re-attendance for the same problem common. GPs’ training should reflect how frequently skin problems are seen and seek to improve patient involvement in decision making and support self-management."   Another concern expressed by the authors regarding long term treatment of skin conditions is that  "Long-term skin problems can place a heavy burden on patients, including impaired health-related quality of life, reduced occupational productivity, and a high socioeconomic and psychological impact." The patients "treatment failure in long-term conditions is common as a result of low adherence with treatments." "Most skin problems were not referred to dermatology specialist care, with GPs offering planned or contingent followup arrangements in two-thirds of cases, which was documented for only half of the problems. Although most skin problems were not referred, re-attendance within 3 months of the index consultation was common." The paper never mentions rosacea in the list of skin conditions treated.  Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Sep 8 : bjgp20X712577. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X712577  The content and conduct of GP consultations for dermatology problems: a cross-sectional study Emma Le Roux et al  
      • Diagnosis of rosacea has traditionally been done with a physical examination, history and 'qualitative human assessment [which] is often subjective and suffers from a relatively high intra- and inter-observer variability in evaluating patient outcomes,' [1] sometimes resulting in misdiagnosis. [2] A team of seven researchers at Ohio State University’s Department of Dermatology and the Wake Forest School of Medicine have developed an algorithm using AI, dubbed “Ros-NET,” that relies on digital images of rosacea patients to diagnose patients which according to the team works 88% to 90% correctly. The team used the same algorithm similar to one they had previously developed for acne. We may be hearing more about Ros-NET. [1] End Notes [1] Skin Res Technol 2020 May;26(3):413-421. doi:10.1111/srt.12817 Ros-NET: A deep convolutional neural network for automatic identification of rosacea lesions.  Binol H, Plotner A, et al. [2] Misdiagnosed Rosacea 
      • Brad Goreski, a celebrity fashion stylist and television personality, has rosacea. He has worked with Galderma in producing the following video:  On August 20, 2020, Brad announced he has rosacea on his Facebook page. 
      • Related ArticlesEvolution of surgical modalities in the management of rhinophyma: our experience. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Aug 22;: Authors: Goh M, Gönen ZB, Sayan A, Ilankovan V Abstract Rhinophyma is a progressive disease of the nose, which is characterised by skin thickening and sebaceous hyperplasia. Patients with rhinophyma are often stigmatised due to worsening disfigurement of their nose. This can also result in functional impairment such as reduced nasal patency. Severe cases of rhinophyma are best managed with varied surgical interventions, as there is no clear 'gold standard' treatment that has been described. We present our experiences in the management of rhinophyma and the evolution of treatment modalities that have been employed over a nine-year period. PMID: 32951923 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] {url} = URL to article
      • As I had previously announced that I will come up with satvik diet and how the role satvik diet plays in our daily life to not only bring about body homeostasis, health improvement but balance our inflammation anywhere in our body and I am targeting here rosacea inflammation. What is Satvik Diet? Satvik diet is a diet which follows the rule of Ayurveda and yogic literature that contains the essence of Sattva in sanskrit (pure energy). Satvik diet is high in fiber, micronutrients and low fat vegetarian diet. (1) There are other dietary foods regimen that we will take into consideration besides this to emphasize the role of food we take in our daily lives and how they impact our mind-body balance. Satvik diet mainly consists of fresh vegetables,fruits, nuts,seeds,legumes,sprouted whole grains, and different herbal teas. Although it is a vegetarian diet but we will consider some benefits that we directly get from non-vegetarian diet and how we can get from this diet.   Health Benefits : There are a number of health benefits when considering this diet but I will purely pay attention to the chronic condition especially rosacea when it comes to inflammation and I have been following this diet for a long time not purely because I have added some other things to get the impact of the whole thing and I will explain it to you later what are those things.   Things to consider : Although it is a high nutrient dense diet and highly effective but there are some other foods which do not come under this diet but we will consider those dietary items to increase the impact of this dietary regimen and I will categorize the other diets under this topic to understand the dietary intervention. I will start with what I have in my whole day and what I consider for my rosacea to get the benefits of this diet and as it is mentioned that this diet has come from a yogic literature that originated in India over 5000 years ago, I will tell you some Yoga Pranayama to consider with this diet which will help control rosacea to go aggravated.   Reference : 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sattvic_diet    
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...