Jump to content
  • Why Form Another Non Profit for Rosacea Sufferers?

    What do you expect from a non profit organization for rosacea? Should the administrators and founders of the non profit organization use most of the donations to pay private contractors that are owned by the director of the non profit organization?

      by Brady Barrows, Founder, RRDi

      The chief reason I formed the RRDi was when I began investigating how the National Rosacea Society (NRS) spends its donated funds (60%) on private contractors spending about 10% for rosacea research. However, the sad reality is that most rosacea sufferers could care less how the NRS spends its donations. If they did they would do something about this. If you do care, why not read the facts below: 

      On average over many years, the NRS spends approximately 10% to 11% on rosacea research while receiving in donations millions of dollars. To put that in terms you can easily understand, for every dollar the NRS receives in donations 10 cents is spent on rosacea research. The rest goes mostly, over 60%, to private contractors that are owned by the president/director of the NRS, Sam Huff. 

      The NRS is a 501 c 3 non profit organization. Many are unaware that all non profits who make $50,000 or more in a year are required to file Form 990 with the Internal Revenue Service of the USA which is then public knowledge for anyone to read. In the past Form 990 has not required disclosure of who donated the funds (however in 2015 there was a notable change about disclosure of donated funds) however, the non profit organization is required to show the percentage of funds from the public or whether the funds are private donations. Several years ago I began reading the Form 990 that the NRS reports and was shocked at how the funds were spent. I encourage you to read all these Form 990 reports that the NRS files with the IRS.

      For instance, in 1998 the NRS received in donations $1,148,375 (over a million dollars!). Of this, only 2.15% of this amount was from the public while 97.85% of this amount came from pharmaceutical companies. Of this total amount the NRS spent only $16,118 (1.5%) on rosacea research. [1] That means that for every dollar donated in 1998 only 1.5 cents was spent that year on rosacea research. To put this in a visual graph see below:
      1998NRSdonationsexpenses.png
      The total expenses that year were $830,856 of which $516,156 (62%) was spent on one private contractor, Sam Huff and Associates. Sam Huff is the director of the NRS. At the time, I thought $1.1 million dollars could be better spent. Why wasn't $1 million spent on rosacea research and the rest on running the organization? I thought rosacea sufferers could do a lot better with donated funds than how the NRS has been spending donated funds. This was the first Form 990 that I read and it knocked my socks off. Are you not shocked as well? Read the NRS Form 990 for 1998 yourself if you have doubts.

      I then discovered a lot about non profits by educating myself on how they work. For example, I learned that many non profit organizations spend very little on their 'mission' and give huge amounts of donated funds to the directors, salaried employees, or to private contractors. For more information on this, read Comparing Non Profit Organizations with Research.

      It is not easy to form a non profit organization. The IRS has made it quite difficult to obtain the 501 c 3 recognition. Basically non profits can organize just about any way they want but getting the IRS to recognize and approve a non profit is another matter that would take too many paragraphs to explain. However, I was able to form the RRDi and get the IRS to approve our non profit and have the recognition letter to prove it. However running a non profit with total volunteers is another matter that is something to write about later. Back to the NRS. I kept following how the NRS spends its donated funds as a non profit.

      The pattern of the NRS since 1998 has been basically the same. 1998 was the only year that the NRS spent only 1.5% on rosacea research. The years since that banner year of 1998 when the NRS received over $1.1 Million US Dollars the NRS has decided to up the money on rosacea research from 1.5% to about 10% on average. Whatever the amount donated the total spending on rosacea research remains about 10 per cent on average after that banner year of 1998. It should be noted that during this same period around 60% of the donations is spent to private contractors owned by Sam Huff, director of the NRS. From 2001 on, the name of the private contractor was changed to Glendale Communications Group, Inc., owned by Sam Huff, and Park Mailing and Fulfillment, Inc., also owned by Sam Huff (view screenshots of the Illinois corporate lookup search results). Most of those years the NRS spent about 10% of its total donations each year on rosacea research. That means that for every dollar donated to the NRS about ten cents is spent on rosacea research. On average for many years around 60% of the donated funds are spent on private contractors owned by the director of the NRS. [2]

      My posts and comments about the NRS for succeeding years are listed in the end notes. [3]

      Brady Barrows RRDi Director

      End Notes

      [1] NRS Form 990 for 1998

      [2] NRS Form 990 Spreadsheet 1998 thru 2016

      [3] Review of NRS Form 990 for previous years

      My post and comment on how the NRS spent donations in 2013 can be read by clicking here.

      My post and comment on how the NRS spent donations in 2014 can be read by clicking here.

      My post and comment on how the NRS spent donations in 2015 can be read by clicking here.

      My post and comment on how the NRS spent donations in 2016 can be read by clicking here.

       

    • Member Statistics

      • Total Members
        1,217
      • Most Online
        499

      Newest Member
      Allyson Ligor
      Joined
    • Posts

      • Related Articles The Spectrum and Sequelae of Acne in Black South Africans Seen in Tertiary Institutions. Skin Appendage Disord. 2018 Oct;4(4):301-303 Authors: Dlova NC, Mosam A, Tsoka-Gwegweni J Abstract
        Introduction: Acne is a chronic disorder of the pilosebaceous unit affecting all ethnic groups. It remains in the top 5 skin conditions seen worldwide. The paucity of data characterizing acne in South African Blacks led us to the documentation of types and sequelae of acne.
        Methods: This is a cross- sectional study describing the spectrum and variants of acne in 5 tertiary hospitals in the second most populous province in South Africa over 3 months (January 1 - March 31, 2015).
        Results: Out of 3,814 patients seen in tertiary dermatology clinics, 382 (10%) had a primary diagnosis of acne or rosacea, forming the fourth most common condition seen. Acne accounted for 361 (94.5%); acne vulgaris was the commonest subtype at 273 (75.6%), followed by steroid-induced acne 46 (12.7%), middle-age acne 6 (1.7%), acne excoriée 2 (0.6%), and "undefined" 34 (9.4%).
        Conclusion: The observation of steroid-induced acne as the second most common variant in Black patients underlines the need to enquire about steroid use and education about the complications of using steroid-containing skin-lightening creams. Treatment of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation should be part of the armamentarium for holistic acne treatment in Blacks, as it remains a major concern even after active acne has resolved.
        PMID: 30410901 [PubMed] {url} = URL to article
      • Related Articles Comprehensive Diagnosis and Planning for the Difficult Rhinoplasty Patient: Applications in Ultrasonography and Treatment of the Soft-Tissue Envelope. Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Oct;33(5):509-518 Authors: Kosins AM PMID: 28962057 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] {url} = URL to article
      • Body Piercing: A National Survey in France. Dermatology. 2018 Nov 07;:1-8 Authors: Kluger N, Misery L, Seité S, Taieb C Abstract
        BACKGROUND: There are no recent data available in France regarding body piercing (BP).
        OBJECTIVE: We examined the demographics, motivations, quality of life, cutaneous conditions, and cutaneous side effects after BP within the French population.
        METHODS: A representative sample of 5,000 individuals (aged 15 and over) from the general population responded to a survey online between April and August 2017. Data regarding demographics, BP characteristics (location, age at first piercing, hesitation, regrets, motivations, cutaneous side effects), tobacco, skin conditions (acne, contact eczema, atopic eczema, rosacea, psoriasis, vitiligo), and tattoos were collected. Respondents also filled an SF-12 quality of life questionnaire.
        RESULTS: Overall, 12% of the respondents reported at least one BP (women: 19.4%, men: 8.4%, p < 0.01). The prevalence was highest among those aged between 25 and 34 years (25.8%). Individuals with BP were more likely to smoke (p < 0.01). The most common body parts for piercings were the external part of the ear (42%), the navel (24%), the tongue (15%), and the nose (11%). Gender differences included localization (belly button and nose for women, eyebrows for men) and motivations (embellishment of the body for women, individuality and sexuality for men). A total of 33.6% of the study participants reported having skin problems after BP, primarily infection (44%). Individuals with BPs were more likely to report having contact eczema, atopic dermatitis, and acne. BP was associated with a lower mental quality of life score.
        CONCLUSION: This is the largest epidemiological study on BP in France to date. It allows us to draw a precise current snapshot of French indi viduals with BP.
        PMID: 30404090 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] {url} = URL to article
      • Related Articles [Not Available]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2016 Jan 25;178(4):V66927 Authors: Carlsen BC, Larsen HK, Hædersdal M PMID: 26815717 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] {url} = URL to article
      • Related Articles The microbiome in dermatology. Clin Dermatol. 2018 May - Jun;36(3):390-398 Authors: Musthaq S, Mazuy A, Jakus J Abstract
        The skin supports a delicate ecosystem of microbial elements. Although the skin typically acts as a barrier, these microbes interact with the internal body environment and imbalances from the "healthy" state that have been linked to several dermatologic diseases. Understanding the changes in microbial flora in disease states allows for the potential to treat by restoring equilibrium. With the rising popularity of holistic and natural consumerism, prebiotics, probiotics, symbiotic, and other therapies are under study to find alternative treatments to these skin disorders through manipulation or supplementation of the microbiome.
        PMID: 29908581 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] {url} = URL to article
      • Related Articles The relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and rosacea over the lifespan: A meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 30;: Authors: Han J, Liu T, Zhang M, Wang A Abstract
        BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: It has been argued that the relationship between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rosacea is bi-directional, but this hypothesis has not been explicitly tested. This systematic review examines the bi-directional prospective relationships between IBD and rosacea.
        METHODS: A comprehensive search through PubMed and EMBASE was undertaken for studies investigating the association between two mainly forms of IBD [ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD)] and rosacea published in English until Jan 2018. Reviewers assessed the eligibility of each report by exposure/outcome measurement and study design. Two sets of pooled risk estimates were calculated using fixed or random effects: the direction from IBD to rosacea and rosacea to IBD.
        RESULTS: Five publications on 13 separate study results involving 5,051,356 participants were eligible for this meta-analysis. A total of 6 outcomes established the direction of association from IBD to rosacea, and 7 outcomes examined the direction of association from rosacea to IBD. Compared to a non-rosacea population, the pooled RR (95% CI) for overall IBD, UC and CD were 1.32 (1.18-1.49), 1.19 (1.02-1.38) and 1.52 (1.25-1.84), respectively (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the summary RR (95% CI) of rosacea in overall IBD, UC and CD patients were 1.66 (1.50-1.84), 1.69 (1.48-1.93) and 2.08 (1.26-3.46), respectively (P < 0.05).
        CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis confirmed a significant bi-directional association in occurrence of IBD and rosacea. Future studies should specifically investigate possible shared pathophysiological mechanisms between the two disorders.
        PMID: 30389397 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher] {url} = URL to article
      • Thanks Apurva, and also thanks for your article on co-existence. 
      • Dear Admin, Thank you for the information of posting article. I did not know about that. Next time I will copy and paste my article in the given space.
    ×