Jump to content
  • Why Form Another Non Profit for Rosacea Sufferers?

    What do you expect from a non profit organization for rosacea? Should the board members or administrators and founders of the rosacea non profit organization use most of the donations to pay private contractors that are owned by two of the board members of the non profit organization who also serve on the board of directors? Or should the non profit for rosacea spend most of its donations on its board members who benefit, comprised mostly of dermatologists and business men who serve on the board of directors, i.e., meetings for members or conventions for dermatologists? Should the skin industry benefit from the activities of the rosacea non profit?  Who do you think should benefit from the rosacea non profit? (1) Dermatologists, (2) Business Men, (3) Rosacea Sufferers?

    by Brady Barrows, Founder, RRDi

    The chief reason I formed the RRDi was when I began investigating how the National Rosacea Society (NRS) spends its donated funds (60%) on private contractors spending about 10% for rosacea research. However, the sad reality is that most rosacea sufferers could care less how the NRS spends its donations. If they did they would do something about this. If you do care, why not read the facts below: 

    On average over many years, the NRS spends approximately 10% on rosacea research while receiving in donations millions of dollars. To put that in terms you can easily understand, for every dollar the NRS receives in donations 10 cents is spent on rosacea research. The rest goes mostly, over 60%, to private contractors that are owned by the president/director of the NRS, Sam Huff. 

    The NRS is a 501 c 3 non profit organization. Some are unaware that all non profits who make $50,000 or more in a year are required to file Form 990 with the Internal Revenue Service of the USA which is then public knowledge for anyone to read. In the past Form 990 has not required disclosure of who donated the funds (in 2015 there was a notable change about disclosure of donated funds) however, the non profit organization is required to show the percentage of funds from the public or whether the funds are private donations. Several years ago I began reading the Form 990 that the NRS reports and was shocked at how the funds were spent. I encourage you to read all these Form 990 reports that the NRS files with the IRS. [4]

    For instance, in 1998 the NRS received in donations $1,148,375 (over a million dollars!). Of this, only 2.15% of this amount was from the public while 97.85% of this amount came from pharmaceutical companies. Of this total amount the NRS spent only $16,118 (1.5%) on rosacea research. [1] That means that for every dollar donated in 1998 only 1.5 cents was spent that year on rosacea research. To put this in a visual graph see below:
    1998NRSdonationsexpenses.png
    The total expenses that year were $830,856 of which $516,156 (62%) was spent on one private contractor, Sam Huff and Associates. Sam Huff was the director of the NRS and served on the board of directors. At the time, I thought $1.1 million dollars could be better spent. Why wasn't $1 million spent on rosacea research and the rest on running the organization? I thought rosacea sufferers could do a lot better with donated funds than how the NRS has been spending donated funds. This was the first Form 990 that I read and it knocked my socks off. Are you not shocked as well? Read the NRS Form 990 for 1998 yourself if you have doubts. 

    nrs_990_1998.pdf

    I then discovered a lot about non profits by educating myself on how they work. For example, I learned that many non profit organizations spend very little on their 'mission' and give huge amounts of donated funds to the directors, salaried employees, or to private contractors. For more information on this, read Comparing Non Profit Organizations with Research. (requires subscription to view)

    It is not easy to form a non profit organization. The IRS has made it quite difficult to obtain the 501 c 3 recognition. Basically non profits can organize just about any way they want but getting the IRS to recognize and approve a non profit is another matter that would take too many paragraphs to explain. However, I was able to form the RRDi and get the IRS to approve our non profit and have the recognition letter to prove it. However running a non profit with total volunteers is another matter that is something to write about later. Back to the NRS. I kept following how the NRS spends its donated funds as a non profit.

    The pattern of the NRS since 1998 has been basically the same. 1998 was the only year that the NRS spent only 1.5% on rosacea research. The years since that banner year of 1998 when the NRS received over $1.1 Million US Dollars the NRS has decided to up the money on rosacea research from 1.5% to about 10% on average. Whatever the amount donated the total spending on rosacea research remains about 10 per cent on average after that banner year of 1998. It should be noted that during this same period around 60% of the donations is spent to private contractors owned by Sam Huff, a board member of the NRS or Andrew Huff who also sits on the board of directors of the NRS. From 2001 on, the name of the private contractor was changed to Glendale Communications Group, Inc., owned by Sam Huff or his son Andrew, and Park Mailing and Fulfillment, Inc., also owned by Sam Huff or his son Andrew (view screenshots of the Illinois corporate lookup search results). Most of those years the NRS spent about 10% of its total donations each year on rosacea research. That means that for every dollar donated to the NRS about ten cents is spent on rosacea research. On average for many years around 60% of the donated funds are spent on private contractors owned by the director of the NRS. [2]

    My posts and comments about the NRS for the years 2016 through 2018 are listed in the end notes. [3]

    All NRS Form 990 public filings are listed in end note [4].

    Another rosacea non profit organization that spends most of its donations on conventions for dermatologists (small percentage on rosacea research) is the AARS (requires subscription to view).

    The Canadian ARSC non profit doesn't disclose what it spends is donations on so we have no idea what it does (requires subscription to view). 

    Brady Barrows, RRDi Treasurer
     


    End Notes

    [1] nrs_990_1998.pdf

    [2] NRS Form 990 Spreadsheet 1998 thru the most recent published

    [3] Review of NRS Form 990 for previous years (2016 thru to the latest year report)

    How the NRS spent donations in 2013 can be read by clicking here.

    How the NRS spent donations in 2014 can be read by clicking here.

    How the NRS spent donations in 2015 can be read by clicking here.

    How the NRS spent donations in 2016 can be read by clicking here.

    [4] NRS Form 990 from 1998 thru to the latest Form 990 year provided by the NRS (over twenty plus years)

    nrs_990_1998.pdf

    nrs_990_1999.pdf

    nrs_990_2000.pdf

    nrs_990_2001.pdf

    nrs_990_2002.pdf

    nrs_990_2003.pdf

    nrs_990_2004.pdf

    nrs_990_2005.pdf

    nrs_990_2006.pdf

    nrs_990_2007.pdf

    nrs_990_2008.pdf

    nrs_990_2009.pdf

    nrs_990_2010.pdf

    nrs_990_2011.pdf

    nrs_990_2012.pdf

    nrs_990_2013.pdf

    nrs_990_2014.pdf

    nrs_990_2015.pdf

    nrs_990_2016.pdf

    nrs_990_2017.pdf

    nrs_990_2018.pdf

    nrs_990_2019.pdf

    nrs_990_2020.pdf



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,675
    • Most Online
      499

    Newest Member
    Richard Trafford-Owen
    Joined
  • Posts

    • "Rosacea is a common inflammatory skin disorder mediated by the dysregulation of both keratinocytes and T cells. Here, we report that aquaporin 3 (AQP3), a channel protein that mediates the transport of water/glycerol, was highly expressed in the epidermis and CD4+ T cells of both rosacea patients and experimental mice....Our findings reveal that AQP3-mediated activation of NF-κB in keratinocytes and activation of STAT3 in CD4+ T cells acted synergistically and contributed to the inflammation in rosacea." [1] "Aquaporin 3 (AQP-3) is the protein product of the human AQP3 gene." [2] "Aquaporins (AQPs) are water channels that facilitate transepithelial water transport across plasma membranes following an osmotic gradient [3]. AQPs are glycosylated integral membrane proteins and widely expressed in bacteria (for review [4]), yeast [5], plants [6] (for review [7]), and mammals..." [3] Obviously we need more rosacea research on this subject. Do you want to support such targeted research? Join the RRDi and post in this thread. A Graphical abstract of AQP3 [4] End Notes [1] PubMed RSS Feed - -Targeting Aquaporin-3 Attenuates Skin Inflammation in Rosacea  [2] Aquaporin-3, Wikipedia [3] Aquaporin-3 in Cancer Saw Marlar, Helene H. Jensen, Frédéric H. Login, and Lene N. Nejsum Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Oct; 18(10): 2106. Published online 2017 Oct 7. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102106 [4] Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes Volume 1861, Issue 4, 1 April 2019, Pages 768-775 Single-channel permeability and glycerol affinity of human aquaglyceroporin AQP3 Roberto A. Rodriguez, Huiyun Liang, Liao Y. Chen, Germán Plascencia-Villa, George Perry 
    • "In fact, rosacea might be underreported and underdiagnosed in populations with skin of color because of the difficulty of discerning erythema and telangiectasia in dark skin. The susceptibility of persons with highly pigmented skin to dermatologic conditions like rosacea, whose triggers include sun exposure, is probably underestimated. Many people with skin of color who have rosacea might experience delayed diagnosis, leading to inappropriate or inadequate treatment; greater morbidity; and uncontrolled, progressive disease with disfiguring manifestations, including phymatous rosacea." Global epidemiology and clinical spectrum of rosacea, highlighting skin of color: Review and clinical practice experience Andrew F. Alexis MD, MPH, Valerie D. Callender MD, Hilary E. Baldwin MD, Seemal R. Desai MD, Marta I. Rendon MD, Susan C. Taylor MD  Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Volume 80, Issue 6, June 2019, Pages 1722-1729.e7
    • In  2004, it has been stated that "The economic burden of skin disease on the US healthcare was approximately $96 billion in 2004. [1] "In 2013, more than 85 million Americans were seen by a medical professional for skin diseases. The United States healthcare system alone is estimated to spend approximately 75 billion dollars annually to treat skin diseases. Additionally, the prevalence of skin disease increases to almost 50% in Americans 65 years of age or older). Moreover, it is estimated that the population over the age of 65 will almost double in the United States in the next 30 years, leading to an inevitable increase in annual healthcare costs for skin disease treatment." [2] This expenditure is on all skin conditions. A "Data Bridge Market Research analyses that the rosacea treatment market, which was USD 1.8 billion in 2022, would rocket up to USD 2.6 billion by 2030 and is expected to undergo a CAGR of 6.1% during the forecast period of 2023 to 2030." - Global Rosacea Treatment Market, DBMR  How much is spent on rosacea in the USA?  Rosacea How many of those billions are spent on rosacea? As the above figures shows it is in the millions of dollars.  "In 2013, the costs associated with the treatment and lost productivity among those who sought medical care for rosacea was $243 million." [2] Between 2002 and 2005, for an individual patient, "Of the total healthcare costs, annual rosacea-related expenditures were $276; approximately 70% of rosacea-related expenditures were due to prescription drugs. [3]  In 2013, "The treatment of rosacea incurred primarily pharmacy rather than medical costs. The median annual pharmacy costs, by type of therapy, were: $285 for combination therapy $142 for a topical medication $63 for an oral antibiotic agent." [4] In 2014, the NRS states, "The lack of health insurance or the amount of the required co-pay kept 47 percent of the survey respondents from obtaining medical care for their rosacea at some point.  And 56 percent reported they had paid out-of-pocket for a rosacea-related medication or procedure not covered by their insurance policy.  Of those answering the survey, the amount paid out of pocket was less than $100 for 33 percent, between $100 and $500 for 35 percent, between $500 and $1,000 for 12 percent and greater than $1,000 for 11 percent." [6] End Notes [1] Bickers DR, Lim HW, Margolis D, et al; for the American Academy of Dermatology Association, and the Society for Investigative Dermatology. The burden of skin diseases: 2004 a joint project of the American Academy of Dermatology Association and the Society for Investigative Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55: 490-500. [2] Aquaporin-3 in the epidermis: more than skin deep Wendy B. Bollag, Lorry Aitkens, Joseph White, and Kelly A. Hyndman Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020 Jun 1; 318(6): C1144–C1153. Published online 2020 Apr 8. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00075.2020 [3] SKIN CONDITIONS BY THE NUMBERS, AAD [4] Healthcare utilization and costs of patients with rosacea in an insured population Michael Romanowicz, Judith J Stephenson, James Q Del Rosso, Greg Lenhart Dermatol. 2008 Jan;7(1):41-9. Healthcare utilization and costs of patients with rosacea in an insured population [5] Cost and Drug Utilization Patterns Associated with the Management of Rosacea Caroline Helwick, Medical Writer Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Nov-Dec; 6(9): 583–584. [6] New Survey Shows Insurance Covers Medication For Most, NRS
    • Int J Dermatol. 2023 Nov 29. doi: 10.1111/ijd.16950. Online ahead of print. NO ABSTRACT PMID:38031285 | DOI:10.1111/ijd.16950 {url} = URL to article
    • PubMed RSS Feed - -Successful Treatment of Granulomatous Rosacea by JAK Inhibitor Abrocitinib: A Case Report If you are taking vandetanib read this:  PubMed RSS Feed - -Dark perifollicular macules and granulomatous rosacea secondary to vandetanib
    • "Trichoscopy is a method of hair and scalp evaluation and is used for diagnosing hair and scalp diseases. The method is based on dermoscopy." [1] "In many cases the combination of clinical examination and trichoscopy is sufficient for establishing the correct diagnosis....The most characteristic features of scalp rosacea are perifollicular scaling and arborizing vessels." [2] Why I like trichoscopy? Professor Lidia Rudnicka End Notes [1] Trichoscopy, Wikipedia [2] PubMed RSS Feed - -Differential diagnosis of red scalp. The importance of trichoscopy image courtesy of Wikipedia Commons
    • Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Nov 20;16:3369-3374. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S440138. eCollection 2023. ABSTRACT Granulomatous rosacea (GR) is a rare inflammatory skin disease characterized by persistent, hard, yellow, brown, red, or flesh-colored papules, plaques, or nodules on the face. Limited data are available on patients treated for GR, with only case reports and case series published. Herein, we describe the case of a 53-year-old woman who presented to the hospital with persistent red to brown and pink patches on both cheeks accompanied by a burning sensation for one month. Histopathological examination of a cutaneous biopsy revealed granulomatous inflammation in focal areas. Both acid-fast and Periodic acid-Schiff staining were negative. The patient was diagnosed with GR based on her clinical presentation and laboratory test results. She was treated with abrocitinib, a JAK-1 inhibitor, for 20 weeks. This resulted in substantial improvement in her rash and the associated burning sensation. Subsequent follow-up visits indicated no adverse effects or relapses. Additionally, a literature review was conducted to compare with the current case, which concluded that abrocitinib is a viable treatment option for GR, exhibiting a relatively high safety profile with minimal side effects. PMID:38021428 | PMC:PMC10674708 | DOI:10.2147/CCID.S440138 {url} = URL to article
    • Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Nov 18;16:3363-3368. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S441581. eCollection 2023. ABSTRACT An abnormal density of Demodex mites can trigger many skin disorders known as demodicosis. Clinical manifestations of demodicosis may resemble other skin diseases and can coexist with other skin disorders, resulting in underdiagnosis and a more challenging diagnosis. Here, we report three cases of demodicosis in acne vulgaris patients. These case series have discussed their clinical features along with optimal strategies for diagnosis and treatment. PMID:38021431 | PMC:PMC10664713 | DOI:10.2147/CCID.S441581 {url} = URL to article
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use