Jump to content
  • Why Form Another Non Profit for Rosacea Sufferers?

    What do you expect from a non profit organization for rosacea? Should the board members or administrators and founders of the rosacea non profit organization use most of the donations to pay private contractors that are owned by two of the board members of the non profit organization who also serve on the board of directors? Or should the non profit for rosacea spend most of its donations on its board members who benefit, comprised mostly of dermatologists and business men who serve on the board of directors, i.e., meetings for members or conventions for dermatologists? Should the skin industry benefit from the activities of the rosacea non profit?  Who do you think should benefit from the rosacea non profit? (1) Dermatologists, (2) Business Men, (3) Rosacea Sufferers?

    by Brady Barrows, Founder, RRDi

    The chief reason I formed the RRDi was when I began investigating how the National Rosacea Society (NRS) spends its donated funds (60%) on private contractors spending about 10% for rosacea research. However, the sad reality is that most rosacea sufferers could care less how the NRS spends its donations. If they did they would do something about this. If you do care, why not read the facts below: 

    On average over many years, the NRS spends approximately 10% on rosacea research while receiving in donations millions of dollars. To put that in terms you can easily understand, for every dollar the NRS receives in donations 10 cents is spent on rosacea research. The rest goes mostly, over 60%, to private contractors that are owned by the president/director of the NRS, Sam Huff. 

    The NRS is a 501 c 3 non profit organization. Some are unaware that all non profits who make $50,000 or more in a year are required to file Form 990 with the Internal Revenue Service of the USA which is then public knowledge for anyone to read. In the past Form 990 has not required disclosure of who donated the funds (in 2015 there was a notable change about disclosure of donated funds) however, the non profit organization is required to show the percentage of funds from the public or whether the funds are private donations. Several years ago I began reading the Form 990 that the NRS reports and was shocked at how the funds were spent. I encourage you to read all these Form 990 reports that the NRS files with the IRS. [4]

    For instance, in 1998 the NRS received in donations $1,148,375 (over a million dollars!). Of this, only 2.15% of this amount was from the public while 97.85% of this amount came from pharmaceutical companies. Of this total amount the NRS spent only $16,118 (1.5%) on rosacea research. [1] That means that for every dollar donated in 1998 only 1.5 cents was spent that year on rosacea research. To put this in a visual graph see below:
    1998NRSdonationsexpenses.png
    The total expenses that year were $830,856 of which $516,156 (62%) was spent on one private contractor, Sam Huff and Associates. Sam Huff was the director of the NRS and served on the board of directors. At the time, I thought $1.1 million dollars could be better spent. Why wasn't $1 million spent on rosacea research and the rest on running the organization? I thought rosacea sufferers could do a lot better with donated funds than how the NRS has been spending donated funds. This was the first Form 990 that I read and it knocked my socks off. Are you not shocked as well? Read the NRS Form 990 for 1998 yourself if you have doubts. 

    nrs_990_1998.pdf

    I then discovered a lot about non profits by educating myself on how they work. For example, I learned that many non profit organizations spend very little on their 'mission' and give huge amounts of donated funds to the directors, salaried employees, or to private contractors. For more information on this, read Comparing Non Profit Organizations with Research. (requires subscription to view)

    It is not easy to form a non profit organization. The IRS has made it quite difficult to obtain the 501 c 3 recognition. Basically non profits can organize just about any way they want but getting the IRS to recognize and approve a non profit is another matter that would take too many paragraphs to explain. However, I was able to form the RRDi and get the IRS to approve our non profit and have the recognition letter to prove it. However running a non profit with total volunteers is another matter that is something to write about later. Back to the NRS. I kept following how the NRS spends its donated funds as a non profit.

    The pattern of the NRS since 1998 has been basically the same. 1998 was the only year that the NRS spent only 1.5% on rosacea research. The years since that banner year of 1998 when the NRS received over $1.1 Million US Dollars the NRS has decided to up the money on rosacea research from 1.5% to about 10% on average. Whatever the amount donated the total spending on rosacea research remains about 10 per cent on average after that banner year of 1998. It should be noted that during this same period around 60% of the donations is spent to private contractors owned by Sam Huff, a board member of the NRS or Andrew Huff who also sits on the board of directors of the NRS. From 2001 on, the name of the private contractor was changed to Glendale Communications Group, Inc., owned by Sam Huff or his son Andrew, and Park Mailing and Fulfillment, Inc., also owned by Sam Huff or his son Andrew (view screenshots of the Illinois corporate lookup search results). Most of those years the NRS spent about 10% of its total donations each year on rosacea research. That means that for every dollar donated to the NRS about ten cents is spent on rosacea research. On average for many years around 60% of the donated funds are spent on private contractors owned by the director of the NRS. [2]

    My posts and comments about the NRS for the years 2016 through 2018 are listed in the end notes. [3]

    All NRS Form 990 public filings are listed in end note [4].

    Another rosacea non profit organization that spends most of its donations on conventions for dermatologists (small percentage on rosacea research) is the AARS (requires subscription to view).

    The Canadian ARSC non profit doesn't disclose what it spends is donations on so we have no idea what it does (requires subscription to view). 

    Brady Barrows, RRDi Treasurer
     


    End Notes

    [1] nrs_990_1998.pdf

    [2] NRS Form 990 Spreadsheet 1998 thru the most recent published

    [3] Review of NRS Form 990 for previous years (2016 thru to the latest year report)

    How the NRS spent donations in 2013 can be read by clicking here.

    How the NRS spent donations in 2014 can be read by clicking here.

    How the NRS spent donations in 2015 can be read by clicking here.

    How the NRS spent donations in 2016 can be read by clicking here.

    [4] NRS Form 990 from 1998 thru to the latest Form 990 year provided by the NRS (over twenty plus years)

    nrs_990_1998.pdf

    nrs_990_1999.pdf

    nrs_990_2000.pdf

    nrs_990_2001.pdf

    nrs_990_2002.pdf

    nrs_990_2003.pdf

    nrs_990_2004.pdf

    nrs_990_2005.pdf

    nrs_990_2006.pdf

    nrs_990_2007.pdf

    nrs_990_2008.pdf

    nrs_990_2009.pdf

    nrs_990_2010.pdf

    nrs_990_2011.pdf

    nrs_990_2012.pdf

    nrs_990_2013.pdf

    nrs_990_2014.pdf

    nrs_990_2015.pdf

    nrs_990_2016.pdf

    nrs_990_2017.pdf

    nrs_990_2018.pdf

    nrs_990_2019.pdf

    nrs_990_2020.pdf



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      1,673
    • Most Online
      499

    Newest Member
    fraziertown
    Joined
  • Posts

    • Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 May 29;69(6):e20230256. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230256. eCollection 2023. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: We aimed to detect the frequency of fibromyalgia syndrome in patients with rosacea and determine whether this frequency was affected by the severity of rosacea and the quality of life. METHODS: In this prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study, a total of 94 consecutive rosacea cases and 87 age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled. The severity of rosacea was assessed in light of the findings of the National Rosacea Society Ethics Committee. Dermatology Life Quality Index and Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life instrument had been applied to the cases of rosacea. The diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome was established according to the 2016 revised fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria, and the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire was used to determine the functional disability. RESULTS: The frequency of fibromyalgia syndrome was higher in the rosacea group than in the control group (p=0.01), and Dermatology Life Quality Index and Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life instrument were higher in patients with rosacea with fibromyalgia syndrome (p=0.006 and p=0.004, respectively). A statistically significant weak positive correlation was observed between Dermatology Quality-of-Life Index, Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life instrument, and Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire; symptom severity scale scores; and fibromyalgia score (r=0.35, r=0.259, and r=0.32 and r=0.376, r=0.305, and r=0.312, respectively). CONCLUSION: The patients with rosacea have higher rates and disability scores of fibromyalgia syndrome than healthy controls, independent of rosacea severity, and quality of life is correlated with fibromyalgia scores. We might point out that fibromyalgia syndrome accompanying rosacea has more restrictions in their daily routine activities than rosacea alone. As such, physicians should be aware of the possible coexistence of rosacea and fibromyalgia syndrome. PMID:37255090 | DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.20230256 {url} = URL to article
    • Front Pharmacol. 2023 May 11;14:1169916. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1169916. eCollection 2023. ABSTRACT Background: Antibiotics are considered the backbone of rosacea management, especially for controlling inflammatory papules and pustules. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of varied prescriptions and doses of antibiotics in treating rosacea by network meta-analysis. Methods: In this study, we compared all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have studied systemic and topical antibiotics and placebo in rosacea therapy. We searched databases such as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and LILACS for published and unpublished RCTs on ClinicalTrials.gov before April 2023. The primary outcome was the improvement of the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scores, and the secondary outcomes consisted of the improvement of the Patient's Global Assessment (PaGA) scores, Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) scores, and adverse events (AEs). We used Bayesian random effects models for multiple treatment comparisons. Results: We identified 1,703 results through these databases. Thirty-one randomized trials with 8,226 patients were included. The heterogeneity and inconsistency between the trials were low, with a low risk of bias of all trials. Oral doxycycline 40 mg, minocycline 100 mg, and minocycline 40 mg, as well as topical ivermectin and metronidazole 0.75%, were effective in treating papules and pustules, thereby decreasing IGA in rosacea. Among these, minocycline 100 mg ranked top in efficacy. As for improving the PaGA scores, topical ivermectin, metronidazole 1%, and systemic oxytetracycline were effective, of which oxytetracycline worked the best. Both doxycycline 40 mg and metronidazole 0.75% presented no therapeutic effect for erythema. Considering the safety of the agents, systemic application of azithromycin and doxycycline 100 mg significantly increase the risk of AEs. Conclusion: Our review suggests that a high dosage of systemic minocycline is the most effective in treating rosacea phenotypes with papules and pustules with a low risk of AEs. However, there were no sufficient evidence-based data in exploring the influence of antibiotics on erythema. The phenotype of rosacea should be taken into consideration along with benefit and safety when making prescriptions due to AEs. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT(2016): http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/962/CN-01506962/frame.html NCT(2017): http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/o/cochrane/clcentral/articles/764/CN-01565764/frame.html. PMID:37251342 | PMC:PMC10210163 | DOI:10.3389/fphar.2023.1169916 {url} = URL to article
    • Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 5;13(1):80-83. doi: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00079. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar. ABSTRACT A 24-year-old woman visited our emergency department due to intermittent dull pain in the right eye, blurred vision, foreign body sensation for 3 weeks, and progressive facial rash with pustules for 3 months. She had a history of recurring skin rash on her face and extremities since early adolescence. Peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) was diagnosed based on slit-lamp examination and corneal topography and then granulomatous rosacea (GR) based on clinical manifestations and skin pathology. Topical prednisolone, artificial tears, oral doxycycline, oral prednisolone, and topical clindamycin were administered. After 1 month, PUK progressed to corneal perforation probably due to eye rubbing. The corneal lesion was repaired with a glycerol-preserved corneal graft. A dermatologist prescribed oral isotretinoin for 2 months in conjunction with topical betamethasone gradually tapered for 14 months. After 34 months of follow-up, no signs of skin and ocular recurrence were noted, and the cornea graft was intact. In conclusion, PUK may present with GR, and oral isotretinoin may be an effective therapy for PUK in the setting of GR. PMID:37252167 | PMC:PMC10220430 | DOI:10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-22-00079 {url} = URL to article
    • Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 12;13(10):1718. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13101718. ABSTRACT Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis are commonly present on facial skin and frequently noted via Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM) examination. These mites inhabit follicles and are often seen in groups of two or more, although D. brevis is usually found as a solitary mite. When observed through RCM, they are typically present as refractile, round groupings seen on a transverse image plane inside the sebaceous opening, as they are vertically oriented, and their exoskeletons refract under near-infrared light. Inflammation may occur, leading to a variety of skin disorders; nonetheless, these mites are considered to be part of normal skin flora. a 59-year-old woman presented to our dermatology clinic for confocal imaging (Vivascope 3000, Caliber ID, Rochester, NY, USA) of a previously excised skin cancer for margin evaluation. She did not exhibit symptoms of rosacea or active inflammation of the skin. Incidentally, a solitary demodex mite was noted in a milia cyst nearby the scar. The mite appeared to be trapped in the keratin-filled cyst and was positioned horizontally to the image plane such that its entire body was captured in a coronal orientation as a stack. Demodex identification using RCM can provide clinical diagnostic value in the context of rosacea or inflammation; in our case, this solitary mite was thought to be part of the patient's normal skin flora. Demodex are practically ubiquitous on the facial skin of older patients and are frequently noted during RCM examination; however, the orientation of the mite referenced herein is uncommon, allowing for a unique view of its anatomy. The use of RCM to identify demodex may become more routine as access to technology grows. PMID:37238202 | PMC:PMC10217450 | DOI:10.3390/diagnostics13101718 {url} = URL to article
    • Skin Res Technol. 2023 May;29(5):e13328. doi: 10.1111/srt.13328. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: This study aims to introduce compound glycyrrhizin injection for the treatment of rosacea by mesoderm therapy, and further analyze the therapeutic and aesthetic effects of this treatment method and its impact on the dermatological quality of life index, which provides new ideas and methods for cosmetic dermatology treatment of rosacea. METHODS: The recruited rosacea patients were divided into Control group (n = 58) and observation group (n = 58) according to the random number table. The control group was treated with topical metronidazole clindamycin liniment, and the study group was additionally used mesoderm introduction of compound glycyrrhizin injection. The transepidermal water loss (TEWL), water content in corneum, and dermatology life quality index (DLQI) in rosacea patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Our results showed that the scores of erythema, flushing, telangiectasia, and papulopustule were significantly reduced in the observation group. In addition, the observation group significantly decreased TEWL and increased the water content of the stratum corneum. Furthermore, the observation group significantly reduced the DLQI of rosacea patients compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The use of mesoderm therapy combined with compound glycyrrhizic acid has a therapeutic effect on facial rosacea and improves patient satisfaction. PMID:37231926 | DOI:10.1111/srt.13328 {url} = URL to article
    • Dermatol Clin. 2023 Jul;41(3):377-392. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2023.02.004. Epub 2023 Apr 18. ABSTRACT Identification of specific patterns, shades, and intensity of erythema in the skin has always been critical and fundamental to diagnostic accuracy in dermatology. Erythema is often less noticeable in darker skin types. The interplay of inflammation and variance of skin tone contributes to appreciable differences in the clinical appearance of cutaneous disease in darker complexions. In this article, we discuss common disorders that present with facial erythema in skin of color and offer distinguishing features of each disorder to assist the clinician with diagnosing these conditions in the presence of deeply pigmented skin. PMID:37236708 | DOI:10.1016/j.det.2023.02.004 {url} = URL to article
    • Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 May 18;16:1279-1286. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S414737. eCollection 2023. ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Abnormal proliferation of Demodex mites causes a skin disorder called demodicosis and has been linked to rosacea. The development of alternative therapy against Demodex mites is currently required. The ability to kill Demodex mites of Thai herbal essential oils has never been explored. This study aimed to study and compare the in vitro killing effect of Thai herbal essential oils, tea tree oil, and metronidazole 0.75% with ivermectin 1% on D. folliculorum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: D. folliculorum mites were collected from the wastes of diagnostic standardized skin surface biopsy samples of demodicosis and rosacea patients for the trial. The microscopic evaluation started immediately after the mites were exposed to immersion oil (negative control), Thai herbal essential oils, tea tree oil, metronidazole 0.75%, and ivermectin 1% (positive control). The survival times of ten mites from each test agent were compared. RESULTS: The efficacy of Thai herbal essential oils and other test agents can be arranged in order as follows: lemongrass oil > sweet basil oil > clove oil > tea tree oil > lesser galangal oil > ginger oil, kaffir lime oil, peppermint oil > citronella oil > galangal oil > cajeput oil > ivermectin 1% > metronidazole 0.75%. CONCLUSION: This current study demonstrated the in vitro killing efficacy on D. folliculorum: Thai herbal essential oils, Tea tree oil > ivermectin 1% > metronidazole 0.75%. Thai herbal essential oils have the potential to be an adjuvant or alternative therapy against Demodex mites. Further in vivo studies are necessary to determine the treatment efficacy and side effects. PMID:37228784 | PMC:PMC10202699 | DOI:10.2147/CCID.S414737 {url} = URL to article
    • Most, if not all of the rosacea research being done is being funded by pharmaceutical companies or what is called the skin industry who have a vested interest in rosacea. The only non profit organizations for rosacea doing any rosacea research are the NRS and the AARS (possibly others) who clearly state that on their financial reports that they are heavily funded by pharmaceutical companies that offers rosacea drug treatments. These non profits as well any just about all rosacea research is funded by the skin industry.  The skin industry includes not only pharmaceutical companies that offer rosacea treatments but also the cosmetic companies that offer over the counter treatments for rosacea.  Science is assumed to be researched in integrity, after all it is science. "Science is a systematic endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe." [1] Research is the "creative and systematic work undertaken to increase the stock of knowledge". [2] Integrity is "the practice of being honest and showing a consistent and uncompromising adherence to strong moral and ethical principles and values." [3] While most science research is without question done in integrity, there is a small unknown percentage of dark science worth investigating that results in retractable published research papers due to fraud or other data misinformation. [4]  The Rosacea Research & Development Institute [RRDi] was formed for the purpose of engaging in novel rosacea research that rosacea sufferers want done which is totally in contrast to the current rosacea research being done by the skin industry. For example, if 10K members of the RRDi each donated a dollar and decided what should be researched on rosacea, this non profit organization could actually engage in a different direction than how the skin industry does their research for their own agenda.  While we appreciate any rosacea research being done, it would be incredible if enough rosaceans got together and actually funded their own rosacea research. Are you in? Join the RRDi.  End Notes [1] Science, Wikipedia [2] Research, Wikipedia [3] Integrity, Wikipedia [4] The Truth Police, BBC
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use